10-28-2010, 02:08 AM
|
#4
|
Slash9point5 is currently offline
Status: Silver Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Eden Prairie, MN
Find me on the Map
My Year: 1995
My Model: Barchetta 182
My Engine: 4.3L Vortec w/ Alpha 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Re: Freeride Wakeboard Tower
Thank you for the responses thus far. I am really looking to get a sense for what people think of this look (good or bad). So, my feelings won't be hurt if you let me know that you don't like it. Of course, any positive reviews would be great too.
In terms of function, I see a few for sure positives:
- Wakeboards stored in back where there is access to them from the swim deck
- Rope stays behind every passenger (not in the way)
- No visibility concerns
- Does not block access to boat from stepping over just behind the window (some do)
As for the potential to push the back of the boat further down, I would expect this to occur to some degree due to the weight being towards the back of the boat. However, while pulling a wakeboarder, I think this would actually occur less than if it were mounted further forward.
Although this seems counterintuitive, imagine trying to lift the bow of a toy boat up with 2 fingers (placed on the hull of the port and starboard side)...it would be easier to lift the bow if your fingers were in the middle of the boat and opposed to the back of the boat. This is due to the concept of moments. Call me out if this for some reason does not apply in this case, but I believe it does. If the tower's legs had a larger span, there would be 4 feet (fingers) involved and this would create more bow rise because the rear legs are pushing down while the front legs are pulling up. This is getting confusing, I'll stop.
Thank you for your time and have a great day,
Kris
|
|
|
|