Want to get rid of the ads? Become a member by registering today.
The Mariah Owners Club

Forum Left Top

Welcome to the The Mariah Owners Club.


Need advice regarding prop.(SC19, 190HP)

Prop Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-11-2008, 12:19 AM   #11

mikeyt is currently offline
Posts: 7,475
Status: Platinum Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ontario
Find me on the Map
My Year: 1996
My Model: Shabah 180
My Engine: 4.3
Gallery Images: 14


Thanks: 87
Thanked 579 Times in 538 Posts
Send mikeyt:
a Private Message
 
Default

hi Kyn

I dont know much about the Ballistic line of props. They do seem like more of a 'performance' prop than the Apollo with the highly cupped blades but then i read this at the Deep Blue site also:

Michigan Match and Ballistic propellers do not use the XHS™ Hub Kit. However, Deep Blue Yacht Supply always recommends an Apollo or Vortex propeller where appropriate, as the hub kit system will save you money in the long run, as well as being an equal to or higher performance propeller.

One of the main disadvantages of 'pressed in' hubs is that if you spin the hub, its not something you're going to be able to repair yourself. You will have to send/take the prop into a prop shop for repairs. Another disadvantage of the agressive rakes on this prop is that it will reduce your hole shot at the expense of higher top end performance. It's not designed to be a 'load' prop. Where it does shine though is cruising at the higher rpms although i understand it has a habit of venting in high speed turns which means you will have to tuck your drive in when doing this.

Looks like model 345134 is the correct Ballistic prop if thats what you want to go with. Model 993205 is the correct Apollo prop along with hub #102 if you go that direction.
__________________
Rarely visit this site given its problems and lack of management interest.
Reply With Quote
  • Old 06-11-2008, 03:35 PM   #12
    kyn Thread Starter

    kyn is currently offline
    Posts: 14
    Status: In Limbo
    Join Date: May 2008
    Gallery Images: 0


    Thanks: 0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Send kyn:
    a Private Message
     
    Default

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mikeyt View Post
    hi Kyn

    I dont know much about the Ballistic line of props. They do seem like more of a 'performance' prop than the Apollo with the highly cupped blades but then i read this at the Deep Blue site also:

    Michigan Match and Ballistic propellers do not use the XHS™ Hub Kit. However, Deep Blue Yacht Supply always recommends an Apollo or Vortex propeller where appropriate, as the hub kit system will save you money in the long run, as well as being an equal to or higher performance propeller.

    One of the main disadvantages of 'pressed in' hubs is that if you spin the hub, its not something you're going to be able to repair yourself. You will have to send/take the prop into a prop shop for repairs. Another disadvantage of the agressive rakes on this prop is that it will reduce your hole shot at the expense of higher top end performance. It's not designed to be a 'load' prop. Where it does shine though is cruising at the higher rpms although i understand it has a habit of venting in high speed turns which means you will have to tuck your drive in when doing this.

    Looks like model 345134 is the correct Ballistic prop if thats what you want to go with. Model 993205 is the correct Apollo prop along with hub #102 if you go that direction.
    I agree! The same numbers I have looked up:-), hmmmmm.. this is not an easy desision doing over seas.
    Reply With Quote
    Old 06-12-2008, 09:03 PM   #13
    kyn Thread Starter

    kyn is currently offline
    Posts: 14
    Status: In Limbo
    Join Date: May 2008
    Gallery Images: 0


    Thanks: 0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Send kyn:
    a Private Message
     
    Default

    Anyone tried Mercurys "new" Enertia stanless steel propeller? I talked to some guys here in Norway, and they said that this superthin bladed prop. is really something compared to Michigan Ballistic and others. Mayby it`s just a hype? They cost over 500$
    Reply With Quote
    Old 06-12-2008, 10:27 PM   #14

    mikeyt is currently offline
    Posts: 7,475
    Status: Platinum Contributor
    Join Date: Jul 2007
    Location: Ontario
    Find me on the Map
    My Year: 1996
    My Model: Shabah 180
    My Engine: 4.3
    Gallery Images: 14


    Thanks: 87
    Thanked 579 Times in 538 Posts
    Send mikeyt:
    a Private Message
     
    Default

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by kyn View Post
    Anyone tried Mercurys "new" Enertia stanless steel propeller? I talked to some guys here in Norway, and they said that this superthin bladed prop. is really something compared to Michigan Ballistic and others. Mayby it`s just a hype? They cost over 500$
    And now you're throwing a 3rd prop (@ $500++) into the mix? If you keep adding prop choices here, it will be winter in Norway before your new prop shows up.

    Basically, what characteristic are you willing to give up? Your choices are 1) Performance, 2) Cruiseability, and 3) Economy. Compromise means you go for performance and accept the resulting economy, or you go for cruisability and MPG and give up performance. Sharp rakes & thin blades are performance props.

    From what i see the Enertia is designed to be a top end (rpm) performance / cruising prop and not a low rpm 'get you out of the hole' or 'pull a skiier' prop.

    For what its worth, have a look at the Stiletto Bay Pro II also. It's a very good compromise prop. I have a friend with a 19' Regal and the 4.3 He runs a 20" pitch Stiletto and is very happy with its performance. The Apollo would be another good compromise prop worth looking at as they are very reasonably priced.
    __________________
    Rarely visit this site given its problems and lack of management interest.
    Reply With Quote
    Old 06-13-2008, 09:34 AM   #15
    kyn Thread Starter

    kyn is currently offline
    Posts: 14
    Status: In Limbo
    Join Date: May 2008
    Gallery Images: 0


    Thanks: 0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Send kyn:
    a Private Message
     
    Smile

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mikeyt View Post
    And now you're throwing a 3rd prop (@ $500++) into the mix? If you keep adding prop choices here, it will be winter in Norway before your new prop shows up.

    Basically, what characteristic are you willing to give up? Your choices are 1) Performance, 2) Cruiseability, and 3) Economy. Compromise means you go for performance and accept the resulting economy, or you go for cruisability and MPG and give up performance. Sharp rakes & thin blades are performance props.

    From what i see the Enertia is designed to be a top end (rpm) performance / cruising prop and not a low rpm 'get you out of the hole' or 'pull a skiier' prop.

    For what its worth, have a look at the Stiletto Bay Pro II also. It's a very good compromise prop. I have a friend with a 19' Regal and the 4.3 He runs a 20" pitch Stiletto and is very happy with its performance. The Apollo would be another good compromise prop worth looking at as they are very reasonably priced.

    He he! I get it! I guess I will choose the Apollo 4-blade.
    Reply With Quote
    Old 06-13-2008, 12:19 PM   #16

    mikeyt is currently offline
    Posts: 7,475
    Status: Platinum Contributor
    Join Date: Jul 2007
    Location: Ontario
    Find me on the Map
    My Year: 1996
    My Model: Shabah 180
    My Engine: 4.3
    Gallery Images: 14


    Thanks: 87
    Thanked 579 Times in 538 Posts
    Send mikeyt:
    a Private Message
     
    Default

    You might want to also consider a set of Smart Tabs. They will help get you on plane quickly, reduce or eliminate that 'low speed wander' and help keep you on plane at lower speeds. They will be around $175-200 shipped to Norway and you can install them yourself in about 45 mins. I wont go into the full details here because we've discussed this numerous times elsewhere. Do a site search for "Smart Tabs" if you want to read more or visit the mfr site at www.nauticusinc.com
    __________________
    Rarely visit this site given its problems and lack of management interest.
    Reply With Quote
    Old 06-14-2008, 06:34 PM   #17
    kyn Thread Starter

    kyn is currently offline
    Posts: 14
    Status: In Limbo
    Join Date: May 2008
    Gallery Images: 0


    Thanks: 0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Send kyn:
    a Private Message
     
    Default

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mikeyt View Post
    You might want to also consider a set of Smart Tabs. They will help get you on plane quickly, reduce or eliminate that 'low speed wander' and help keep you on plane at lower speeds. They will be around $175-200 shipped to Norway and you can install them yourself in about 45 mins. I wont go into the full details here because we've discussed this numerous times elsewhere. Do a site search for "Smart Tabs" if you want to read more or visit the mfr site at www.nauticusinc.com

    Just ordered

    I have read a little about them, but didn`t notice the-low-speed-wandering argument. This is a serious problem with my Sc19
    Reply With Quote
    Old 06-14-2008, 08:08 PM   #18

    mikeyt is currently offline
    Posts: 7,475
    Status: Platinum Contributor
    Join Date: Jul 2007
    Location: Ontario
    Find me on the Map
    My Year: 1996
    My Model: Shabah 180
    My Engine: 4.3
    Gallery Images: 14


    Thanks: 87
    Thanked 579 Times in 538 Posts
    Send mikeyt:
    a Private Message
     
    Default

    You ordered them with the 60 lb actuators i hope? The 80# arms will be too strong for your boat.
    __________________
    Rarely visit this site given its problems and lack of management interest.
    Reply With Quote
    Old 06-14-2008, 08:26 PM   #19
    kyn Thread Starter

    kyn is currently offline
    Posts: 14
    Status: In Limbo
    Join Date: May 2008
    Gallery Images: 0


    Thanks: 0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Send kyn:
    a Private Message
     
    Default

    ****! Are you sure? Just ordered the 80 cause in the web this look like the match for my boat considering the lenght of boat and enginesize.
    Reply With Quote
    Old 06-15-2008, 01:20 AM   #20

    mikeyt is currently offline
    Posts: 7,475
    Status: Platinum Contributor
    Join Date: Jul 2007
    Location: Ontario
    Find me on the Map
    My Year: 1996
    My Model: Shabah 180
    My Engine: 4.3
    Gallery Images: 14


    Thanks: 87
    Thanked 579 Times in 538 Posts
    Send mikeyt:
    a Private Message
     
    Default

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by kyn View Post
    ****! Are you sure? Just ordered the 80 cause in the web this look like the match for my boat considering the lenght of boat and enginesize.

    Absolutely. The 80# actuators will be too strong. Nauticus will exchange them for you though so send then an email ([email protected])
    __________________
    Rarely visit this site given its problems and lack of management interest.
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks




    Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
     


    Similar Threads
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    Prop Pitch? borz170 Prop Talk 16 01-16-2022 05:17 PM
    Proper Prop Specs? steve Prop Talk 16 04-29-2009 07:50 AM
    What prop are you running? KSP181 Prop Talk 12 11-20-2008 10:55 PM
    PROP Size? TALLRAM Prop Talk 4 07-28-2008 05:07 PM
    prop choice Acadianbasic Prop Talk 3 08-27-2007 12:18 AM



    Forum Right Top
    Forum Left Bottom Forum Right Bottom
     
    Right Left
    Member Login
    Forgot password?
    Forum LeftForum Right

    About the Club
    Age of the Mariah Owners Club:

    Total Members: 18,530
    Total Threads: 12,965
    Total Posts: 68,332
    Find us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Subscribe to Mariah Owners Club on YouTube
    There are 647 users
    currently browsing forums.
    Forum LeftForum Right

    Find us on Facebook
    Forum LeftForum Right

    Club Sponsors
    Right Sponsor





    Forum LeftForum Right
    Right Right
    Right Bottom Left Right Bottom Right